Member since 2017-07-15T03:50:57Z. Last seen 2025-04-09T16:00:01Z.
2754 blog posts. 128 comments.
80 marc__1 2 hrs 27
https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1651562/000119312521071525/d65490ds1.htm
柏羽診所
04 2325 5018
https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/1YjqApubAIXy7i4M5pch0J3p1fGjpgLPI?usp=sharing
Mr Hui / Rainbow Printing
Shop No 10-12 & 89,
King's Park Lane (英皇柏麗大道購物中心)
No 278-288 King's Road, Fortress Hill.
Note you don't need to pay the printing fee.
來到英國買了車,已很少叫Uber,很多優惠卷都過了期。反過來,有沒有機會由demand變成supply?本來也有可能,最近卻出現了變數。
英國最高法院就一群司機與Uber長達5年的訴訟作出裁決,司機可獲得法定勞工權益,包括最低工資、有薪假期等褔利。
換言之,此先例一出,已為全職Uber司機打開缺口。縱使Uber千萬個不情願,亦需尊重法院裁決,給予旗下全職司機更多保障。
有人認為,由於英國最高法院有終審權,此例開後,Uber商業模式已分崩離析 - 至少在英國玩完 - 還會牽連其他的零工經濟(Gig Economy)行業。
在Uber以外,英國Gig Economy公司亦包括Deliveroo、Pimlico Plumbers、Taskrabbit等等。若問到,這是Gig economy末日嗎?我認為未必,但可以肯定成本上升無可避免,商業模式也需要調整。
調整方向很有可能是Gig economy和僱員關係的混合體。畢竟作為平台,不管物流或專業服務,若要維持服務水平,都不可能單靠業餘「炒散」。
英國最高法院對於「自僱」和「員工」的定義,最主要分野在於員工即使不願意工作,也沒有權利向僱主「說不」。相反,自僱者若不願意,可以拒絕客戶要求,「有得揀,先至係老闆」。箇中最大啟示,我認為是「等價交換」:追求保障,自然要犧牲若干自由;追求自由,則需以收入保障作代價。
零工平台初衷毫無疑問是好的,尤其是對於一心炒散的工作者。問題出在,對於全職工作者而言,平台無了期抽佣,以及工作保障不足,構成無可避免的矛盾。類似情況也出現在Amazon身上,也由於長尾的全職網店,渴望經營自己客戶關係,於是才有Shopify堀起。
而我始終相信,零工大台都不會倒下,但未來會出現更多工具及計劃,幫助專業工作者以自僱方式創業。這也是我跟拍檔們,深信英國的創業孵化器大有作為的原因。
PUBLISHED THU, FEB 25 20211:17 PM
ESTUPDATED THU, FEB 25 20214:37 PM EST Bob Pisani
KEY POINTS
Since February 10th, 10-year Treasury yields have moved from 1.13% to as high as 1.61%, a rise of 48 basis points, the highest level in a year.
Bond investors are getting worried about the potential for inflation.
Said one investor on the impact to equities: “The days of simply piling into the market leaders regardless of valuation may be drawing to a close.”
Federal Reserve Chairman Jerome Powell testifies before the Senate Banking Committee hearing on "The Quarterly CARES Act Report to Congress" on Capitol Hill in Washington, December 1, 2020. Federal Reserve Chairman Jerome Powell testifies before the Senate Banking Committee hearing on “The Quarterly CARES Act Report to Congress” on Capitol Hill in Washington, December 1, 2020.
Stock investors are trying desperately to interpret what a rise in bond yields means for the stock market.
Since February 10th, 10-year Treasury yields — which are not inflation adjusted — have moved from 1.13% to as high as 1.61%, a rise of 48 basis points, the highest level in a year. (One basis point equals 0.01%)
Fear of inflation is causing investors to speculate the Federal Reserve may have to shift policy sooner than expected, by either reducing bond purchases or even raising rates at some point. That would be a negative for stocks. The Dow was down 559 points on Thursday.
Rising bond yields challenge stocks and the Fed — Here’s why
Peter Tchir from Academy Securities says the recent rise in 10-year bond yields represents a perception about inflation, but not necessarily the reality: “The rise in 10-year bond yields does not reflect an actual rise in inflation, it reflects that investors anticipate there will be a rise in inflation,” he told me.
Tchir notes that Federal Reserve Chairman Jerome Powell has been pushing back against the idea that over-the-top inflation is coming, noting in his testimony that broad signs of inflation have not been present in the real world, and that if they do occur any such rises would be “transitory.”
Who’s right on inflation?
Bond investors are getting worried about the potential for inflation. Powell says to stop worrying about it. Who’s right?
It depends on who you ask, and what you are looking at.
Do we see inflation in the real world? We do in commodities: Oil is approaching the highest since 2018, for example, and copper is at an almost 10-year high.
But signs of consumer inflation, for example, have been muted, with inflation at or below 2% for many years.
Bulls like Tchir insist that, in this case, the rise in bond yields is not a negative for stocks: “This time the rise in yields is coming from economic growth, stimulus, and infrastructure. All of that is good for stocks. That’s why this rise doesn’t scare me too much.”
He says the rise in commodity prices can be easily absorbed, and believes that much of that rise is just a temporary condition reflecting the reopening, and that prices will revert back to “normal” levels over time.
Hans Mikkelsen, credit strategist at Bank of America, is not so sure. He agrees with Tchir on economic growth, but thinks it will be much stronger than anticipated and that will push inflation up: “Since the summer of 2020 economists have consistently underestimated economic growth to an extent never seen before. There appears a real risk the Fed is not going to be able to sound dovish much longer and that transition could see wider credit spreads.”
Stocks on edge
The key to the game, Tchir insists, is whether Powell can stick to his guns: “If the Fed remains committed to keeping short-term yields low, that will give people comfort we will not get a ‘taper tantrum,’ where rates suddenly skyrocket. Powell has told us he is comfortable with inflation and he is not going to react to short-term movements. I believe he is going to stick to his guns.”
There’s another issue: Because stock prices are so high there is no room for error. Small shifts in yields could cause tech investors in particular to take profits, under the assumption that this is as good as it gets.
Veteran stock commentator Michael Farr from Farr, Miller & Washington has already told clients that even this relatively modest rise in rates is a signal: “The days of simply piling into the market leaders regardless of valuation may be drawing to a close. Investors must now recognize that there are alternative opportunities out there, including both heretofore underperforming stocks as well as incrementally more attractive bonds. A powerful economic rebound combined with rising interest rates and higher inflation, if that indeed transpires, will change the investment backdrop in a meaningful way.”